Tag Archives: C+

CHEVALIER

Producers: Ed Guiney, Andrew Lowe, Stefani Robinson and Dianne McGunigle    Director: Stephen Williams   Screenplay: Stefani Robinson   Cast: Kelvin Harrison Jr., Samara Weaving, Lucy Boynton, Ronkẹ Adékoluẹjo, Marton Csokas, Alex Fitzalan, Minnie Driver, Sian Clifford, Henry Lloyd-Hughes, Joseph Prowen, Jim High, Jessica Boone and Ben Bradshaw   Distributor: Searchlight Films

Grade: C+

Joseph Bologne (+1799) was one of the most extraordinary men of his age. Born in the early 1740s in Guadeloupe, the son of a wealthy French plantation owner and a Senegalese slave, he was brought to France by his father around 1749 and became a virtuoso fencer as well as a talented violinist and composer.  But his biracial background limited the possibilities open to him, both legally and socially, and though he had earlier enjoyed the patronage of Queen Marie Antoinette, he was an adherent of the revolution of 1789, even leading an all-black legion in battle.  Like so many, however, he fell afoul of the increasing radicalism of the 1790s and suffered imprisonment under Robespierre.  His later years saw his popularity return to some degree, but after his death Napoleon’s policies led to the suppression of his music, though some survived.  In recent decades recognition of his remarkable accomplishments has grown.       

In constructing a biographical film about Bologne, screenwriter Stefani Robinson has fashioned a portrait of a charismatic man struggling to assert himself in a world where the odds were stacked against him while also coming to terms with his own identity as a person of mixed race.  In doing so she has employed the skeleton of fact about his life and career, but liberally embellished it with speculation and simple invention, closing with a note of triumph that’s more wishful thinking than reality.  While dramatically effective in a rather blunt fashion, the result too often panders to contemporary expectations when a more subtle and accurate approach could have carried greater weight. 

A similar observation might be made about the music score, credited to Kris Bowers and Michael Abels; some is based on Bologne’s actual compositions, but much of that has been rearranged to give it a more modern sound, as though the originals weren’t adequately “revolutionary.”  (In fact, his works are pleasant but typical examples of the galant style of the period; you can listen to fairly extensive excerpts performed in their untouched form on YouTube.)

As directed in more workmanlike than inspired fashion by Stephen Williams, the film follows Bologne over a four-decade period, from the point at which his father (Jim High) brings him for instruction to the academy headed by Nicolas Texier de La Boëssière (Ben Bradshaw), where he excels in fencing and music but must suffer mistreatment by his classmates, through 1789, when he plays for the rebellious mob in defiance of the authorities.  Except for the opening scenes, he’s embodied by Kelvin Harrison, Jr. (“Luce”), an intense young actor who succeeds in expressing both Bologne’s physical grace (demonstrated in a fencing exhibition before King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, after which the queen—played rather weakly by Lucy Boynton—rewards him with the title of Chevalier de Saint-Georges) and his cocky self-confidence as a musician.

The latter is made clear even in the bravura but misconceived opening sequence, in which Bologne is portrayed—anachronistically in every possible respect—engaging in an impromptu violin-playing contest with none other than Mozart (Joseph Prowen), depicted as a preening brat (shades of “Amadeus”).  From a musical perspective, the embellishments Bologne is shown adding to the Mozart concerto they jointly perform reek of nineteenth-century romanticism rather than eighteenth-century classicism.  From a historical one, while it’s true that Mozart knew Bologne (they actually stayed in the same patron’s house during one of Mozart’s stays in Paris), there’s no evidence they were rivals; rather they appear to have admired one another, and Mozart learned from the older Bologne.

The same problems recur in the final sequence of Bologne’s performance in 1789.  The piece he plays may be based on a theme of his, but it’s refashioned to sound like something John Williams might have composed.  (Compare it to the lightly retouched Bologne concerto played over the final credits.)  And the triumphant caption about the black legion he led neglects to mention that he was removed from his post, and of course that he was later denounced as disloyal to the revolution and imprisoned.

What is depicted between these two bookending sequences?  Much is made of a rumored affair between him and Marie-Josephine de Montalembert (pretty but vacuous Samara Weaving), whose jealous husband Marc René (scenery-chewing Marton Csokas), the marquis, becomes his implacable enemy.  The same is true of his friendship with the reform-minded young Duke of Orléans, Louis Philippe II (a lightweight Alex Fitzalan).  Both have basis in fact, though the screenplay gives the marquis an exaggerated primacy among the monarchists (while turning Marie-Josephine into Bologne’s preferred soprano, for which there is no evidence), and, as with Bologne, overlooks the fate of the duke, who, while so ardent a revolutionary that he voted to execute the king, was deemed a counter-revolutionary and executed during the Reign of Terror.

Of equal importance to the story is the tale of his musical career, marked by antagonism with personal and racial overtones.  The central event is his application to the directorship of the Paris Opera, which actually was derailed by opposition from the influential Marie-Madeleine Guimard (haughty Minnie Driver), whose advances he had spurned, and singers like Sophie Arnould (Jessica Boone), who objected to taking direction from a mulatto. 

So much is accurate.  But the film elects to add to the mix a contest with another eminent composer of the day, Christoph Willibald Gluck (effete Henry Lloyd-Hughes)—who is portrayed, like Mozart earlier on, as his direct rival, at best an exaggeration.  The choice of director is orchestrated here as dependent on which of the two candidates will compose the superior opera, and Bologne’s is “Ernestine,” in the mounting of which he enlists the formidable Madame de Genlis (Sian Clifford), and for which he chooses Marie-Josephine as his star.  A good deal of time is devoted to that choice, which includes rehearsals focusing on a single phrase from an aria in which Marie-Josephine shines (the number, one of the few surviving portions of the otherwise lost piece, can be heard in full in several YouTube clips).  But of course Gluck wins out for reasons other than excellence (though in fact he never became director of the opera, though some of his works were staged there) and “Ernestine” was a flop, getting only a single performance.  None of that is mentioned, however.

A final piece of the story “Chevalier” tells has to do with Bologne’s growing embrace of his African roots, here explained by the influence of his mother Nanon (Ronkẹ Adékoluẹjo, a bit too shrewdly calculating), whom he came to know only when she came to live with him after his father’s death.  She introduced him, the script suggests, to the life and culture of the black residents in Paris, an experience that propelled him to embrace more revolutionary ideas.  Possible, certainly, but purely speculative.                                                  

So the picture is a tissue of facts, half-truths, inventions and speculation, in that regard not unlike the biopics about American composers Hollywood produced in the forties and fifties.  It’s a reasonably handsome picture, with an impressive production design by Karen Murphy and eye-catching costumes by Oliver Garcia, elegant cinematography by Jess Hall and fairly crisp editing by John Axelrad.  But in the end it’s a pretty facile, overly simplified, factually dubious if good-looking portrait of a complex man whose multifaceted career deserved more nuanced treatment.      

BOSTON STRANGLER

Producers: Ridley Scott, Kevin J. Walsh, Michael Pruss, Josey McNamara and Tom Ackerley   Director: Matt Ruskin   Screenplay: Matt Ruskin   Cast: Keira Knightley, Carrie Coon, Alessandro Nivola, David Dastmalchian, Morgan Spector, Bill Camp, Chris Cooper, Robert John Burke, Rory Cochrane, Peter Gerety, Luke Kirby, Stephen Thorne, John Lee Ames, Therese Plaehn, Ryan Winkles and Greg Vrotsos   Distributor: Hulu

Grade: C+

When Richard Fleischer’s thriller “The Boston Strangler” was released in 1968, it presented the murder of thirteen women in the area of Beantown between 1962 and 1964 as solved.  Tony Curtis starred as Albert DeSalvo, who confessed to the killings, but since the confession could not be used in court because of a deal negotiated by his attorney (F. Lee Bailey), was convicted on other charges and sentenced to life in prison, where he was murdered in 1973.

Fleischer’s movie was criticized as sensationalistic at the same, and it certainly fiddled with the facts of the case as detailed in the 1966 book by Gerold Frank on which it was loosely based.  This new take on the case by writer-director Matt Ruskin could hardly be called sensationalistic; its mood is unrelievedly grim, solemn and understated.  Its major departure, however, is its revisionism.  Doubts about DeSalvo’s guilt have circulated since his arrest and conviction, and Ruskin seizes on them to construct a tale of conspiracy and greed that resulted in the imprisonment of a man who might not have been an innocent (it admits, in one of the closing captions, that 2013 DNA evidence indicates that DeSalvo was probably at the scene of the last of the murders), but was most likely not the perpetrator in all of them.

And as to heroes, here they’re not the Boston cops, most of whom are portrayed as corrupt, incompetent or simply apathetic under embattled Commissioner McNamara (Bill Camp), or the special state investigator John Bottomly, who was at the forefront Fleischer’s film (played by icon Henry Fonda) but is here relegated to a virtual walk-on (he’s played by Steve Routman), but the two female reporters who were instrumental in linking the murders and tracking down suspects.  In that respect the picture resembles Fleischer’s less that it does Maria Schrader’s “She Said,” about the Washington Post journalists whose work resulted in the downfall of Harvey Weinstein.

Unfortunately, it’s not the equal of that picture, because it lacks tension and excitement and ends with a highly speculative conclusion that strains for profundity it fails to reach.  But it does offer a credible portrait of the two women—neophyte Loretta McLaughlin (Keira Knightley) and veteran Jean Cole (Carrie Coon)—who struggled with the sexism of the day and the demands of their home lives (Morgan Spector plays Loretta’s supportive husband and Therese Plaehn her critical sister-in-law, while Stephen Thorne is Jean’s more distant spouse) to push the investigation forward despite initially halfhearted support from their editor Jack MacLaine (Chris Cooper) and strident opposition from the paper’s publisher Eddie Holland (Robert John Burke).  Both actresses do good work, with Knightley’s reserved but determined demeanor contrasting nicely with Coon’s brusque, extrovert manner.

McLaughlin is, however, able to build some rapport with a detective (Alessandro Nivola) disenchanted with the department, and gradually she and Jean identify some possible suspects—a boss who’s gotten his secretary pregnant; David Marsh (Ryan Winkles), a sinister young man with a vendetta against his ex-girlfriend; and DeSalvo (David Dastmalchian)—only to have each of them apparently cleared.  But in time the facts supposedly exonerating DeSalvo are swept away, and Bailey (Luke Kirby) works a deal for him to confess to all the murders, with the proviso that his admission cannot be used against him in court.

McLaughlin’s belief in his guilt will be shaken a few years later, however, when she’s contacted by a Michigan detective (Rory Cochrane) with information about a suspiciously similar series of killings in Ann Arbor, an episode Ruskin actually began the film with before flashing back to 1962 Boston.  That, along with deep dives into files of various kinds and an interview with a former inmate (Jon Lee Ames), leads Loretta to a startling conclusion about DeSalvo’s confession, one that involves Bailey and another of his clients, George Nassar (Greg Vrotsos), as well as some others to whom we’ve already been introduced—a conclusion underpinned by the general attitudes toward women at the time.

“Strangler” is drenched in a dark period atmosphere, courtesy of John P. Goldsmith’s production design, Arjun Bhasin’s costumes, and Ben Kutchins’ cinematography, the moody visuals accentuated by Ruskin’s stately pacing, Anne McCabe’s unhurried editing, and Paul Leonard-Morgan’s brooding score. 

All of that, along with the nicely complementary performances of Knightley and Coon and solid work from the supporting cast, make the film an intriguing take on the case. And yet like so many revisionist investigations of notorious crimes, it can offer no definitive closure—all one need do to confirm that is to look into the so-called Michigan Murders of 1967-69, which Ruskin assumes to be connected to the Boston killings; it’s far better at pointing out the deficiencies of the “accepted” solution than in constructing a persuasive alternative. 

In the end “Boston Strangler” is no more convincing than “The Boston Strangler,” though Ruskin’s discreet treatment of the violence makes it far less lurid than its predecessor, even though made more than half a century later.