Producers: Luisa Law, Meghan Hanlon, Scott Lastaiti, Tiffany Boyle and David Gonzales Director: Paul Schrader Screenplay: Paul Schrader Cast: Richard Gere, Uma Thurman, Jacob Elordi, Michael Imperioli, Caroline Dhavernas, Victoria Hill, Kristine Froseth, Penelope Mitchell, Megan MacKenzie, Jake Weary, Ryan Woodle, Sean Mahan, Peter Hans Benson, Scott Jaeck, Cornelia Guest, Gary Hilborn and Aaron Roman Weiner Distributor: Kino Lorber
Grade: C+
Under the best of circumstances, the act of remembering is a kind of excavation, a rummaging about in partial recollections embellished or diminished over time. And when the process is encumbered by a habit of deception and invention, and by the mental fog brought by illness and medication, the result is even more uncertain. In the case of Leonard Fife, the terminally ill documentary filmmaker who’s the subject of Paul Schrader’s film, an adaptation of Russell Banks’s final novel “Foregone” (2021), the remembering is made even more uncertain by the fact that it’s also intended as a confession to sins real or imagined. In short, what Fife says represents the ramblings of a narrator who is unreliable to say the least, and a practiced liar at worst.
The set-up is identical with that in the book. Fife (played in the present by Richard Gere, and in flashbacks mostly by Jacob Elordi, although at some points Gere takes his place), a celebrated maker of activist documentaries (the first on Agent Orange, and others on clerical sexual abuse and the illegal harvesting of seals) suffering from terminal cancer, who’s agreed to be interviewed by two of his former students, Malcolm (Michael Imperioli) and Diana (Victoria Hill). They’ve collaborated on documentary films together, and see the interview as a means of both cementing Fife’s reputation (making him, as one remarks, as central to Canada’s cultural history as pianist Glenn Gould) and enhancing their own as his legatees.
Fife’s participation has been only reluctantly agreed to by his wife Emma (Uma Thurman), who has also served as his producer, and his nurse Rene (Caroline Dhavernas), who has serious reservations about the impact the effort will have on his condition. Even Fife at first questions why he accepted the invitation. But once brought before the camera (equipped with a device like Errol Morris’ Interrotron, allowing eye contact between subject and cameraman), he’s determined to participate because his intention isn’t to give Malcolm what he wants (a sort of “greatest hits” account of his work), but a rambling admission of his many betrayals and lies, which taken together would demolish his status as a courageous draft resister during the Vietnam War, a committed family man and a dedicated documentary truth-teller. It’s a confession directed to Emma, who he says deserves the truth as the only person who loves him.
It’s a disjointed, meandering process, interrupted by objections from Emma (who argues that Fife’s words are a confabulation of truth, fiction and mistaken memory) and Rene (who sees the effect it’s having on her patient). There’s an additional problem in Malcolm’s sexy assistant Sloan (Penelope Mitchell), in whom Diana suspects Malcolm has a more than a mentor’s interest. She also catches Leonard’s eye.
But the major difficulty is the story Fife is insistently blurting out—about a trip purportedly to Cuba fueled by a sleazy theft, two abandoned wives and a son he left behind, an escape to Canada that’s hardly the act of a dissident icon, a filmmaking career that began not through principle but accident—and so on. Some of this, certainly, is already known to Emma—the abandoned son (Zach Shaffer) of his second wife Alicia (Kristine Froseth) had actually tracked him down, only to be rebuffed, and she’d commiserated with him—but other admissions, like the fact that he slept with Gloria, the partner of a painter friend (Jake Weary) shortly after hearing that Alicia had miscarried with their second child, are apparently surprises to her.
Schrader tells us all this, and more (like Fife’s brief first marriage), in a fractured style cinematically mirroring the protagonist’s confused mental state, shifting frame formats and switching from black-and-white to color. He even has the cast double some roles—Thurman, for instance, plays Gloria in a black wig, and Mitchell assumes a second role as well. The technical elements help to clarify the different timeframes involved, but not always (see the black-and-white induction physical episode, done in seriocomic fashion, which is at odds with the color, wide-screen format used in many past scenes), but much remains mystifying, like the time young Leonard apparently spent working for the pharmaceutical company owned by Alicia’s father (Peter Hans Benson) and uncle (Scott Jaeck), who offered him the position so that he wouldn’t take a teaching job up north and remove his wife from her southern home.
In short, nothing is made crystal clear, expect for the present-day interview segments, which end with an appalling trick by Malcolm that speaks to the unsavory methods of filmmakers generally. But Schrader and his colleagues—cinematographer Andrew Wonder and editor Benjamin Rodriguez Jr.—achieve the measured, almost unworldly atmosphere they’re after. Adding to it are the soft-toned, quasi-folksy songs by Phosphorescent (Matthew Houck) that serve as the soundtrack. Production and costume design (Deborah Jensen and Aubrey Laufer, respectively) are excellent.
As to the performances, Gere, who worked with Schrader as long ago as “American Gigolo,” tries very hard to play old and infirm, but the turn merely seems calculated, while Elordi is smoothly efficient as the younger version, although the lack of physical similarity is a problem. The rest are more adequate than remarkable.
This is the second adaptation of a Banks novel Schrader has made. The first, “Affliction” (1997) also dealt with the burden of memory, but it did so in a more direct fashion, and was more powerful for it. In “Oh, Canada” (a title Banks is supposed to have preferred to his own), the fragmentation, while true to the novel, frankly works against the overall impact, making for a remoteness than impedes emotional involvement. While one can admire the stylistic fidelity Schrader shows toward the source, the effect is more cerebral than visceral. And while one can appreciate the point being made about the fragility and malleability of memory, in the end it seems simply posited rather than effectively dramatized.